Wired posts The See-Through CEO that explores the advantage corporate top-dogs gain from understanding and managing transparency as a strategic tool. The article weighs the pros and cons of radical transparency — as questionable a term as “totally honest” as if to suggest there are degrees of integrity – and cites some examples worth thinking about.
In discussing the strategic potential of CEO transparency Clive Thompson makes this interesting point which should resonate with business bloggers who consider such lofty things to their own advantage:
Google is not a search engine. Google is a reputation-management system. And that’s one of the most powerful reasons so many CEOs have become more transparent: Online, your rep is quantifiable, findable, and totally unavoidable. In other words, radical transparency is a double-edged sword, but once you know the new rules, you can use it to control your image in ways you never could before.
Why don’t we ditch the tautology “radical transparency” and opt for something that more accurately reflects what really goes on in the C-suites of many corporations? How about “opacity” instead?
At least then we can honestly frame a discussion about about the degrees of filtering that are appropriate for those areas of business which properly belong out of the public domain. We can also begin to examine the dubious motivations for those who choose to adopt “openness” as a means of obscuring the truth, managing reputations that may not withstand the tests of real integrity.
Comebacks...