<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are All Bloggers Anarchist Bomb-Throwers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/07/19/are-all-bloggers-anarchist-bomb-throwers-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/07/19/are-all-bloggers-anarchist-bomb-throwers-2/</link>
	<description>A Contrarian View of Life in the Recruitosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 16:46:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Recruitomatic</title>
		<link>http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/07/19/are-all-bloggers-anarchist-bomb-throwers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Recruitomatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitomatic.amitaigivertz.com/?p=38#comment-66</guid>
		<description>The Businesspundit has a related post on some more Wobblie antics: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesspundit.com/50226711/a_starbucks_union_surely_you_jest.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Starbucks Union? Surely You Jest&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Businesspundit has a related post on some more Wobblie antics: <a href="http://www.businesspundit.com/50226711/a_starbucks_union_surely_you_jest.php" rel="nofollow">A Starbucks Union? Surely You Jest</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recruitomatic</title>
		<link>http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/07/19/are-all-bloggers-anarchist-bomb-throwers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Recruitomatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitomatic.amitaigivertz.com/?p=38#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Goerge says: I take it, though, you agree that there is some
inherent contradiction, or at least irony, in organizing a co-op?

Recruitomatic says: Absolutley, yes! Just as it would be an inherent contradiction to expect all Catholics to be priests and nuns.

I hope this clears things up.

Amitai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goerge says: I take it, though, you agree that there is some<br />
inherent contradiction, or at least irony, in organizing a co-op?</p>
<p>Recruitomatic says: Absolutley, yes! Just as it would be an inherent contradiction to expect all Catholics to be priests and nuns.</p>
<p>I hope this clears things up.</p>
<p>Amitai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recruitomatic</title>
		<link>http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/07/19/are-all-bloggers-anarchist-bomb-throwers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Recruitomatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitomatic.amitaigivertz.com/?p=38#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Hey, George:

My point regarding the question you asked was not relative to the unionizing of a co-op which I think you implied was odd – hence my Church comparison - but that you should have known that the Wobbly agitator&#039;s where about as politically in tune with the today&#039;s realities as the &#039;punks&#039; they more properly represent. I&#039;m sorry - reading it again I can see I was unclear.

My referencing your question as stupid should not imply that I think you are. I know for a fact that you are not! I would never mean to cause you any embarrassment. If I did, I apologize.

Amitai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, George:</p>
<p>My point regarding the question you asked was not relative to the unionizing of a co-op which I think you implied was odd – hence my Church comparison &#8211; but that you should have known that the Wobbly agitator&#8217;s where about as politically in tune with the today&#8217;s realities as the &#8216;punks&#8217; they more properly represent. I&#8217;m sorry &#8211; reading it again I can see I was unclear.</p>
<p>My referencing your question as stupid should not imply that I think you are. I know for a fact that you are not! I would never mean to cause you any embarrassment. If I did, I apologize.</p>
<p>Amitai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Lenard</title>
		<link>http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/07/19/are-all-bloggers-anarchist-bomb-throwers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>George Lenard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitomatic.amitaigivertz.com/?p=38#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the quick pickup on my post.  I stayed up late to finish it and when I awoke you had already joined the fray with more complete and cogent thoughts than my own! Your blog has now joined my monstrous blogroll at George&#039;s Employment Blawg.

I am uncertain exactly what you meant by the following:

&quot;I think George should have known that before asking, “Is there something inherently inconsistent about unionizing a co-op?”. With all due respect, George, that is a stupid question. Should all Catholics be priests and nuns?&quot;

The analogy between the questions can be interpreted to present different answers to the first question.

I would answer your question: &quot;of course, not all Catholics should be priests and nuns; it depends on many factors, notably their own personalities and preferences.&quot;

So the answer to my original &quot;stupid question&quot; is &quot;sometimes, George, but don&#039;t overgeneralize.  A union might be needed in a particular co-op that was exploiting employees despite its lip-service to utopian principles.&quot;

Or is your point the less subtle one that both questions are &quot;duhs,&quot; but my &quot;stupid question is a &quot;duh, yes&quot; and yours a &quot;duh, no&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quick pickup on my post.  I stayed up late to finish it and when I awoke you had already joined the fray with more complete and cogent thoughts than my own! Your blog has now joined my monstrous blogroll at George&#8217;s Employment Blawg.</p>
<p>I am uncertain exactly what you meant by the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;I think George should have known that before asking, “Is there something inherently inconsistent about unionizing a co-op?”. With all due respect, George, that is a stupid question. Should all Catholics be priests and nuns?&#8221;</p>
<p>The analogy between the questions can be interpreted to present different answers to the first question.</p>
<p>I would answer your question: &#8220;of course, not all Catholics should be priests and nuns; it depends on many factors, notably their own personalities and preferences.&#8221;</p>
<p>So the answer to my original &#8220;stupid question&#8221; is &#8220;sometimes, George, but don&#8217;t overgeneralize.  A union might be needed in a particular co-op that was exploiting employees despite its lip-service to utopian principles.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or is your point the less subtle one that both questions are &#8220;duhs,&#8221; but my &#8220;stupid question is a &#8220;duh, yes&#8221; and yours a &#8220;duh, no&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
