<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheezhead Sticks It To The Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/11/03/cheezhead-sticks-it-to-the-man-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/11/03/cheezhead-sticks-it-to-the-man-2/</link>
	<description>A Contrarian View of Life in the Recruitosphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:50:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maureen Sharib</title>
		<link>http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/11/03/cheezhead-sticks-it-to-the-man-2/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen Sharib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitomatic.amitaigivertz.com/?p=85#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Hey Ami - are you on vacation?  I miss your pointed pirouettes.

Maureen Sharib
Telephone Names Sourcer
513 899 9628</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ami &#8211; are you on vacation?  I miss your pointed pirouettes.</p>
<p>Maureen Sharib<br />
Telephone Names Sourcer<br />
513 899 9628</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://blogversity.com/recruitomatic/2006/11/03/cheezhead-sticks-it-to-the-man-2/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 14:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitomatic.amitaigivertz.com/?p=85#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Given monsters young age I find it surprising that Monster the &#039;disruptor&#039; is acting here like such a &#039;disrupted&#039; grumpy ol&#039; fart of a company.  It strikes me as rather uncouth. I would love to have seen a positive, &lt;em&gt;we still kick butt and here&#039;s how&lt;/em&gt; comment from Monster skillfully rebutting each of Goldberg&#039;s criticisms. That way, there&#039;d be a nice balance to Jason Goldberg&#039;s flogging of the Monster product.  Jason was just expressing his opinion after all.

Perhaps this should be a call to create a new empirical approach and metric to measuring &lt;em&gt;web based crap&lt;/em&gt;? It would come in quite handy these days on the blogosphere and in the main stream media alike.   There&#039;s a parallel here on a topic that I would say is just as vexing, beguiling, grossly subjective and wholly unsubstantiated as crap - the taste of beer.  It&#039;s a bit long but given its landmark status I think it&#039;s worth quoting here in its entirety.

&quot;Subj:  Letter to Miller Company
12/31/97

 A True Story.

 The following is a letter sent to Miller Brewing Company
 earlier this year. Miller&#039;s response is at the end.

 Miller Brewing Company Milwaukee, Wisconsin  53201

 Dear Sir or Madam,

 I have been a drinker of Miller beer&#039;s for many years
 (actually, ever since that other company donated a big
 chunk of change to Handgun Control Inc. back in the mid
 80&#039;s).

 Initially, my beer of choice was Lite, but some time in
 mid-1990 while in Honduras I switched to MGD smuggled up
 from Panama.  Now, for nearly six years, I have been a
 faithful drinker of MGD.

 For these past years, I have come to expect certain things
 from Genuine Draft.  I expect that whenever I see that
 gold can of MGD, I am about ready to enjoy a great, smooth
 brew.

 But wait!  Sometime around the first of the year, my
 beloved MGD changed colors, so to speak.  That familiar
 gold can was no longer gold!  Knowing that I am, by nature,
 somewhat resistant to change, I forced myself to reserve
 judgment on the new can design.

 Gradually, I grew to appreciate the new label.  That was
 until about May of this year.  That was when I discovered
 (empirically) that I really didn&#039;t like the new design.
 Further investigation of the cause of my distress resulted
 in the following observations:

 1. Your cans are made of aluminum.
 2. Aluminum is a great conductor of energy.
 3. Your beer is commonly consumed outside, and thus, the
    container may be exposed to sunlight.
 4. Sunlight striking the can causes radiant warming
    of the surface of the can.
 5. The resultant heat (energy) is transferred through the
    aluminum, by conduction, to the contents of the can
    (the beer).
 6. Warm beer sucks.

 This is a process that can be observed in just about any
 beer.  However, this process is significantly accelerated
 in MGD because you painted the damn can black!!!

 Who was the rocket scientist that designed the new graphic
 for the can and implemented the change right before summer?
 Granted, this process may not be real evident up there in
 Wisconsin, but down here in Oklahoma where the summers are
 both sunny and hot, this effect is quite a problem.  There&#039;s
 no telling what the folks in Texas and Arizona are having
 to put up with.

 Knowing that you would probably not address this issue unless
 you had firm evidence of a problem, I and several other
 subjects conducted extensive experimentation.  The results
 of these experiments are listed below.

 The experiments were conducted over two days on the deck next
 to my pool.  The study included seven different types of beer
 (leftovers from a party the previous weekend) that were
 initially chilled to 38 (and then left exposed to sunlight
 for different lengths of time.  These beers were sampled by
 the test subjects at different intervals.  The subjects, all
 normally MGD drinkers, were asked at each sampling interval
 their impressions of the different beers.  The length of time
 between the initial exposure to sunlight and the point where
 the subject determined the sample undrinkable (the Suckpoint)
 was determined.  The average ambient temperature for the
 trials was 95 degrees F.

 Beer Type                        Average Suckpoint (min)
 Miller Lite (white can)          6.2
 Bud (white can)                  5.5
 Bud Lite (silver can)            5.2
 Ice House (blue and silver can)  4.4
 Coors Lite (silver can)          4.1
 Miller Genuine Draft (black can) 2.8
 Coors (gold can)                 0.1

 It was evident that the color of the can directly correlates
 to the average suckpoint, except for Coors which was pretty
 much determined to suck at any point.

 It is to be hoped that you will consider re-designing your
 MGD cans.  All beer drinkers that are not smart enough to
 keep their beer in the shade will thank you.

 Sincerely,

Bradley Lee
Beer-drinker


 Miller Brewing Company&#039;s response to the letter sent in by
 Bradley Lee.

 Dear Bradley Lee,

 Thank you for your letter and your concern about the MGD
 can color as it relates to premature warming of the contents.
 Like you, we at Miller Beer take beer drinking very seriously.
 To that end, we have taken your letter and subsequent
 experiment under serious consideration.  Outlined below are
 our findings and solution to your problem.  May we add that
 we have had similar letters from other loyal beer drinkers,
 mostly from the Southern United States.

 First, let us congratulate you on your findings.  Our analysis
 tends to agree with yours regarding Coors.  It certainly does
 suck at about any temperature.

 Now, it was our intention when redesigning the MGD can to
 create better brand identity and brand loyalty.  Someone in
 marketing did some kind of research and determined we needed
 to redesign the can.  You will be pleased to know, we have
 fired that idiot and he is now reeking havoc at a pro-gun
 control beer manufacturer.  The design staffer working in
 cahoots with the marketing idiot was also down-sized.  How-
 ever, once we realized this mistake, to undo it would have
 been even a bigger mistake.  So, we took some other actions.
 From our market research, we found a difference between
 Northern beer drinkers and Southern beer drinkers.

 Beer drinkers in the South tend to drink slower than beer
 drinkers in the North.  We are still researching why that
 is.  Anyway, at Miller Beer, it was never our intentions
 to have someone take more than 2.5 minutes to enjoy one of
 our beers.  We pride ourselves in creating fine, smooth,
 quick drinking beers and leave the making of sissy, slow
 sipping beers to that Sam guy in Boston.

 However, it is good to know that you feel our Miller Lite
 can last as long as 6 minutes.  However, may we suggest
 in the future you try consuming at least two in that time
 frame.

 From your letter, we had our design staff work &#039;round the
 clock to come up with a solution that would help not just
 MGD but all our fine Miller products.  We hope you have
 recently noticed our solution to your problem.  We found
 that the hole in the top of the can was not big enough for
 quick consumption. So, we have now introduced the new
 &quot;Wide Mouth&quot; cans.  We hope this will solve all your
 problems.  Might I also suggest that if you want to get
 the beer out of the can even faster, you can poke a hole
 on the side near the bottom, hold your finger over it,
 open the can, tip it to your mouth and then pull your
 finger off the hole.  This is a common way to drink beer
 at  parties and impress your friends. This technique is
 known as &quot;shot-gunning&quot;.  You should like the name.

 Again, thank you for your letter and bringing to our
 attention that there might be other beer drinkers taking
 more that 2.5 minutes to drink our beers.  Let me assure
 you that I am have our advertising department work on a
 campaign to solve this problem, too.

 Sincerely,

 Tom B. Miller Public Relations Miller Brewing Co.

 P.S. And remember, at Miller Beer we do favor gun control,
 too.  So please use two hands when firing. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given monsters young age I find it surprising that Monster the &#8216;disruptor&#8217; is acting here like such a &#8216;disrupted&#8217; grumpy ol&#8217; fart of a company.  It strikes me as rather uncouth. I would love to have seen a positive, <em>we still kick butt and here&#8217;s how</em> comment from Monster skillfully rebutting each of Goldberg&#8217;s criticisms. That way, there&#8217;d be a nice balance to Jason Goldberg&#8217;s flogging of the Monster product.  Jason was just expressing his opinion after all.</p>
<p>Perhaps this should be a call to create a new empirical approach and metric to measuring <em>web based crap</em>? It would come in quite handy these days on the blogosphere and in the main stream media alike.   There&#8217;s a parallel here on a topic that I would say is just as vexing, beguiling, grossly subjective and wholly unsubstantiated as crap &#8211; the taste of beer.  It&#8217;s a bit long but given its landmark status I think it&#8217;s worth quoting here in its entirety.</p>
<p>&#8220;Subj:  Letter to Miller Company<br />
12/31/97</p>
<p> A True Story.</p>
<p> The following is a letter sent to Miller Brewing Company<br />
 earlier this year. Miller&#8217;s response is at the end.</p>
<p> Miller Brewing Company Milwaukee, Wisconsin  53201</p>
<p> Dear Sir or Madam,</p>
<p> I have been a drinker of Miller beer&#8217;s for many years<br />
 (actually, ever since that other company donated a big<br />
 chunk of change to Handgun Control Inc. back in the mid<br />
 80&#8217;s).</p>
<p> Initially, my beer of choice was Lite, but some time in<br />
 mid-1990 while in Honduras I switched to MGD smuggled up<br />
 from Panama.  Now, for nearly six years, I have been a<br />
 faithful drinker of MGD.</p>
<p> For these past years, I have come to expect certain things<br />
 from Genuine Draft.  I expect that whenever I see that<br />
 gold can of MGD, I am about ready to enjoy a great, smooth<br />
 brew.</p>
<p> But wait!  Sometime around the first of the year, my<br />
 beloved MGD changed colors, so to speak.  That familiar<br />
 gold can was no longer gold!  Knowing that I am, by nature,<br />
 somewhat resistant to change, I forced myself to reserve<br />
 judgment on the new can design.</p>
<p> Gradually, I grew to appreciate the new label.  That was<br />
 until about May of this year.  That was when I discovered<br />
 (empirically) that I really didn&#8217;t like the new design.<br />
 Further investigation of the cause of my distress resulted<br />
 in the following observations:</p>
<p> 1. Your cans are made of aluminum.<br />
 2. Aluminum is a great conductor of energy.<br />
 3. Your beer is commonly consumed outside, and thus, the<br />
    container may be exposed to sunlight.<br />
 4. Sunlight striking the can causes radiant warming<br />
    of the surface of the can.<br />
 5. The resultant heat (energy) is transferred through the<br />
    aluminum, by conduction, to the contents of the can<br />
    (the beer).<br />
 6. Warm beer sucks.</p>
<p> This is a process that can be observed in just about any<br />
 beer.  However, this process is significantly accelerated<br />
 in MGD because you painted the damn can black!!!</p>
<p> Who was the rocket scientist that designed the new graphic<br />
 for the can and implemented the change right before summer?<br />
 Granted, this process may not be real evident up there in<br />
 Wisconsin, but down here in Oklahoma where the summers are<br />
 both sunny and hot, this effect is quite a problem.  There&#8217;s<br />
 no telling what the folks in Texas and Arizona are having<br />
 to put up with.</p>
<p> Knowing that you would probably not address this issue unless<br />
 you had firm evidence of a problem, I and several other<br />
 subjects conducted extensive experimentation.  The results<br />
 of these experiments are listed below.</p>
<p> The experiments were conducted over two days on the deck next<br />
 to my pool.  The study included seven different types of beer<br />
 (leftovers from a party the previous weekend) that were<br />
 initially chilled to 38 (and then left exposed to sunlight<br />
 for different lengths of time.  These beers were sampled by<br />
 the test subjects at different intervals.  The subjects, all<br />
 normally MGD drinkers, were asked at each sampling interval<br />
 their impressions of the different beers.  The length of time<br />
 between the initial exposure to sunlight and the point where<br />
 the subject determined the sample undrinkable (the Suckpoint)<br />
 was determined.  The average ambient temperature for the<br />
 trials was 95 degrees F.</p>
<p> Beer Type                        Average Suckpoint (min)<br />
 Miller Lite (white can)          6.2<br />
 Bud (white can)                  5.5<br />
 Bud Lite (silver can)            5.2<br />
 Ice House (blue and silver can)  4.4<br />
 Coors Lite (silver can)          4.1<br />
 Miller Genuine Draft (black can) 2.8<br />
 Coors (gold can)                 0.1</p>
<p> It was evident that the color of the can directly correlates<br />
 to the average suckpoint, except for Coors which was pretty<br />
 much determined to suck at any point.</p>
<p> It is to be hoped that you will consider re-designing your<br />
 MGD cans.  All beer drinkers that are not smart enough to<br />
 keep their beer in the shade will thank you.</p>
<p> Sincerely,</p>
<p>Bradley Lee<br />
Beer-drinker</p>
<p> Miller Brewing Company&#8217;s response to the letter sent in by<br />
 Bradley Lee.</p>
<p> Dear Bradley Lee,</p>
<p> Thank you for your letter and your concern about the MGD<br />
 can color as it relates to premature warming of the contents.<br />
 Like you, we at Miller Beer take beer drinking very seriously.<br />
 To that end, we have taken your letter and subsequent<br />
 experiment under serious consideration.  Outlined below are<br />
 our findings and solution to your problem.  May we add that<br />
 we have had similar letters from other loyal beer drinkers,<br />
 mostly from the Southern United States.</p>
<p> First, let us congratulate you on your findings.  Our analysis<br />
 tends to agree with yours regarding Coors.  It certainly does<br />
 suck at about any temperature.</p>
<p> Now, it was our intention when redesigning the MGD can to<br />
 create better brand identity and brand loyalty.  Someone in<br />
 marketing did some kind of research and determined we needed<br />
 to redesign the can.  You will be pleased to know, we have<br />
 fired that idiot and he is now reeking havoc at a pro-gun<br />
 control beer manufacturer.  The design staffer working in<br />
 cahoots with the marketing idiot was also down-sized.  How-<br />
 ever, once we realized this mistake, to undo it would have<br />
 been even a bigger mistake.  So, we took some other actions.<br />
 From our market research, we found a difference between<br />
 Northern beer drinkers and Southern beer drinkers.</p>
<p> Beer drinkers in the South tend to drink slower than beer<br />
 drinkers in the North.  We are still researching why that<br />
 is.  Anyway, at Miller Beer, it was never our intentions<br />
 to have someone take more than 2.5 minutes to enjoy one of<br />
 our beers.  We pride ourselves in creating fine, smooth,<br />
 quick drinking beers and leave the making of sissy, slow<br />
 sipping beers to that Sam guy in Boston.</p>
<p> However, it is good to know that you feel our Miller Lite<br />
 can last as long as 6 minutes.  However, may we suggest<br />
 in the future you try consuming at least two in that time<br />
 frame.</p>
<p> From your letter, we had our design staff work &#8217;round the<br />
 clock to come up with a solution that would help not just<br />
 MGD but all our fine Miller products.  We hope you have<br />
 recently noticed our solution to your problem.  We found<br />
 that the hole in the top of the can was not big enough for<br />
 quick consumption. So, we have now introduced the new<br />
 &#8220;Wide Mouth&#8221; cans.  We hope this will solve all your<br />
 problems.  Might I also suggest that if you want to get<br />
 the beer out of the can even faster, you can poke a hole<br />
 on the side near the bottom, hold your finger over it,<br />
 open the can, tip it to your mouth and then pull your<br />
 finger off the hole.  This is a common way to drink beer<br />
 at  parties and impress your friends. This technique is<br />
 known as &#8220;shot-gunning&#8221;.  You should like the name.</p>
<p> Again, thank you for your letter and bringing to our<br />
 attention that there might be other beer drinkers taking<br />
 more that 2.5 minutes to drink our beers.  Let me assure<br />
 you that I am have our advertising department work on a<br />
 campaign to solve this problem, too.</p>
<p> Sincerely,</p>
<p> Tom B. Miller Public Relations Miller Brewing Co.</p>
<p> P.S. And remember, at Miller Beer we do favor gun control,<br />
 too.  So please use two hands when firing. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
